Prosthesis - I can see nothing wrong with it. It's giving back what we once had or should have had. For those who are disabled, and have missing limbs, I believe this would be especially important as it gives those disabled the abilities they should have had. It is nice that dreams won't be shattered due to prosthesis, we have the famous Oscar Pistorius. Despite him having had both his legs amputated from the early ages of 11 months, he was still able to run in the 400k/m race at the 2012 Paralympics and even the 2012 Olympics against fully able contestants.
![]() |
| Fig. leg-hubless3.jpg |
On a different spectrum of Transhumanism, I also read an article recently on LiveScience.com (2013) on how a drug used to treat type-2 diabetes also has the ability increased the life expectancy of mice. The mice which were fed this drug lived an extra 5% longer than normal. These mice were also known to be more physically fit at an old age. Mice however which did have an increased amount of this drug, died earlier than normal due to kidney failure.
These types of findings could, of course, one day spread to humans. A lot of people would dream to see their great grand children, or reach another century. Although with that being said, it would not be a good thing if humans were to live much longer than we do now, otherwise earth would become over populated - but an extra 5% would not seem that bad!
There are many sci-fi programmes and films that go through a bunch of these Cybernetics and Transhumanism functions which currently do not exist or are in working progress. A sci-fi film of which I find very fascinating is Neil Burger's Limitless, which includes the made up drug NZT. "You know how they say we can only access 20% of our brain? This lets us access all of it!" (Limitless, 2011).
Something of which sounds rather nice on the surface, but could get a little out of hand if it had actually existed. "Even if everyone had an IQ of 200, you'd have exactly the same range of personalities as you have now, and because that's a determining factor in how good your society is, you won't necessarily have a better society" (Richard Haier, a neuroscientist and professor emeritus at the University of California, 2013).
But what about genetically modifying babies before their born, we have the capabilities of changing their hair, eyes, metabolism, IQ (Buzzle, 2012). Personally, this is not something I would want to do, editing the features of your child, in my opinion, make it so that the baby is no longer yours.


